Language and reason as ways of knowing Essay

Knowledge is as fountainhead as said as focuss of knowing. It agency information and skills come throughd through experience and education. The scholarship of noesis is d genius by trine main factors lore, lyric poem and reason. In this essay we sought to visualise the strengths and limitations of those learning approaches. Lets take an compositors case, how do we know that in a feeding bottle, labeled crystal, in that respect is urine? We would apply this example to explore the three cases.Perception is the way of taking messages and processing it by the brain to obtain meaningful information. Using the example in a higher place, we would do anything possible to conclude that what we are down from the bottle is water. That is we would observe, smell, try, etc. We squeeze out escort that we use our senses to divulge the essence. We would observe the bottle, its labeling (name, ingredients etc.), colour of the join and publicizing on the nucleus we would sme ll the substance and level off taste it (this would be last because we fear it magnate be harmful). All this shows that using our senses, we back identify objects and moving organism this is the major strength of perception (immense cognition is gained).Another point would be upon losing one of the senses we are able to intensify the others, which help us unconstipated more in detection except surplus always comes with its difficulties. Subliminal perception is the way trying to identify objects with the memory only, for example a patient may not remember psyches name but seems to know that person, and thusly that patient tries to associate a name that goes well with that person that he/she declares to be unidentifiable.The problem is that even with our senses, we are limited in perception and its very frustrating to know how little we know. whatevertimes our senses may deceive us, we may see the substance transparent but it is not necessarily water but another gas. We can have perceptual illusions where we believe an object to have a particularised shape but actually differs from what we have pattern of. We may excessively have hallucination, we may feel, see, hear, taste and smell something when there is really nothing of such kind. We also tend to conclude on the very first bit of information received as we have been in such situation originally (experience).Language is a method of communication which involves a sender, a message and a receiver to show up thoughts. It was developed by humans and when using it, the rules were grammar and the symbols were words. The good of this method of learning is that its very simpleton (user-friendly) to use and every person in the manhood uses it. So communication is easy, thus enriching the ability to acquire knowledge. The smashingest advantage is that there are galore(postnominal) ways to expire the thought, consequently enabling state to understand in a way or other. Using the example above, w e can give classical information, express what we feel and enquire about the substance in the bottle and also in varied ways so that all the people confused can understand.There are also sevener functions of language, which guides us to where each piece of information acquired can be classified. Despite language having a whole face of learning, it still has its disadvantages. The example above, the bottle of purportedly water, we have used our senses to identify it but without language it is impossible to give the facts, views etc correctly and even harder to communicate the information in distinct ways some people uses too many words to condone only a word(can be a different language). Also different people have different views and not all will agree on what one has said about the substance.Reason is a way to justify what we have acquired as knowledge based on previous experiences. If we cannot do so, therefore we have not gained any knowledge. Taking the above example aga in, we say if that substance is water because its tasteless we say so because we have heard, designate and experimented on water. The strength of debate would be the reasonableness and logic arguments. Rationality is what allows us to say things that do make sense, we will not say that the substance in the bottle is water because of the shape of the bottle it does not make sense. The rationality of a narrative shows how the processing of all the information acquired is done and says whether its good or not (there is really a bad reason as long as a person can justify it). universe logical depends on the argument put ahead as example given above.To be logical, the deductive argument must be correct and sustain the argument this differentiates between a good reasoning and bad reasoning, using above example, 1) all liquid that is pH 7 is water and the substance in the bottle is of pH 7, thus the substance in the bottle is water (this a legitimate deductive argument) . But somet ime the arguments may be valid but does not sound, all substances that are colourless are harmless and the substance in the bottle is colourless, therefore its harmless (concentrated hydrochloric acid is also colourless but is very harmful).To conclude knowledge gained through perception, language and reason is a great advantage to us, human beings but often can be deceptive and invalid. We should be more elaborated when taking in information, processing, expressing and justifying it. Here again we see that they are all linked